The legal entanglement of Hogi Minaya, a Sleman resident who became a suspect for defending himself against muggers, has captured national attention. He was charged with negligence on the highway after two muggers he pursued were involved in an accident and died, sparking widespread public inquiry, particularly regarding the application of existing laws. In response to the growing concern, on Wednesday, January 28, House Commission III summoned Sleman Police Chief Kombes Pol Edy Setyanto Erning Wibowo and the Sleman Prosecutor’s Office for questioning. Following this, on Friday, January 30, Edy Setyanto was temporarily relieved of his duties as Police Chief.
Sleman Police Chief Temporarily Suspended Following Hogi Minaya Case
Sleman Police Chief Kombes Pol Edy Setyanto Erning Wibowo has been temporarily suspended from his position. This decision stems from the handling of the Hogi Minaya case, which generated significant public controversy and threatened to damage the image of the National Police (Polri). In an official statement, Polri clarified that this action underscores their commitment to upholding professionalism, transparency, and accountability within the police institution.
The contentious case originated when Hogi Minaya pursued individuals who had snatched his wife’s bag. The pursuit tragically culminated in a traffic accident that resulted in the deaths of the two alleged muggers. Brigjen Trunoyudo Wisnu Andiko, Head of the Public Information Bureau of the Polri Public Relations Division, explained that “this temporary deactivation is carried out solely to ensure the objectivity of further examination and to guarantee that the law enforcement process proceeds professionally, transparently, and fairly.”
Beyond Suspension, Sleman Police Chief Also Under Propam Investigation Due to Hogi Case
Adding another layer to the unfolding situation, DIY Regional Police Chief Irjen Pol Anggoro Sukartono confirmed that the Sleman Police Chief is not only suspended but is also facing an investigation by Propam, the internal affairs division, concerning allegations of weak supervision during the case’s investigative process. This rigorous examination aims to identify any potential disciplinary or ethical violations committed by Polri officials throughout the handling of the Hogi Minaya case.
“This suspension is intended to facilitate internal supervisors, in this case, Propam, to proceed with the examination and uncover any violations committed by the members involved, including both the Police Chief and the Head of Traffic (Sleman Police),” Anggoro clarified. He emphasized that the process seeks to ascertain whether any breaches were made by key officials or investigators. “Due to the weak supervision (from the Sleman Police Chief), the law enforcement process caused a stir. The examination process is still ongoing,” Anggoro stated at the DIY Regional Police Headquarters on Friday, January 30. He reiterated the purpose of the suspension was to streamline Propam’s ongoing investigation. Based on DIY Police Chief’s Order Number: Sprin/145/I/KEP./2026 dated January 30, 2026, Edy has been reassigned as a Senior Officer (Pamen) of the DIY Regional Police.
Mahfud MD Comments on Sleman Police Chief’s Suspension and Hogi Minaya Case
Mahfud MD, a prominent member of the Police Reform Acceleration Commission and former Coordinating Minister for Political, Legal, and Security Affairs, offered his perspective on the administrative implications of the Sleman Police Chief’s suspension within Polri’s internal mechanisms. He articulated that such a deactivation is an integral part of Polri’s internal administrative framework and can be interpreted variably, depending on the specific policy context adopted by the institution’s leadership.
“A dismissal can signify a promotion for the individual removed, but it can also serve as a demotion or sanction,” Mahfud explained to media representatives at Widya Mataram University. He underscored that the fundamental legal substance of the matter far outweighs mere changes in the positions of law enforcement officials. According to Mahfud, if errors are identified in how officials handled a case, the imperative is to rectify the legal process itself. “So that individuals who defend themselves and seek to uphold their rights proportionally and reasonably should not be penalized,” he added, referring to the crucial aspects of the Hogi Minaya case.
Regarding Hogi Minaya Case, DIY Police Chief Cites 25 Socializations of New Criminal Code
Irjen Pol Anggoro Sukartono, the DIY Regional Police Chief, addressed the handling of the Hogi Minaya case, where Hogi was named a suspect after defending his wife from a mugging. He attributed the incident, in part, to a perceived lack of internal coordination and supervision within the police ranks. Anggoro asserted that the DIY Regional Police had made considerable efforts to ensure a thorough understanding of the newly enacted legal frameworks, particularly the Criminal Code (KUHP) and Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP), as part of their drive to enhance professionalism in investigations and law enforcement.
“With the implementation of the new KUHP and KUHAP, the Regional Police has conducted 25 socialization sessions since 2023 to foster an understanding of the investigative process. However, if there are still shortcomings in its execution, we are committed to continuous improvement,” Anggoro stated at the DIY Regional Police Headquarters on Friday, January 30. He further elaborated, “The incident in Sleman, characterized by a lack of coordination, insufficient supervision from superiors, and inadequate coordination with functional supervisors, disrupted the investigative process, leading to the situation we are confronting today.”
Sleman Prosecutor’s Office Officially Closes Hogi Minaya Case for Legal Interest
In a significant development, the Sleman District Prosecutor’s Office (Kejari Sleman) announced the cessation of prosecution and the closure of the criminal case against Hogi Minaya, exercising the authority granted to it by law.
“Based on the authority granted by law, I, the Head of the Sleman District Prosecutor’s Office, as the public prosecutor, issue Prosecution Cessation Decree Number: TAP-670/M.4.11/EOH.2/01/2026 in the name of suspect Adhe Pressly Hogiminaya,” stated Sleman Prosecutor Bambang Yunianto to reporters on Friday, January 30. This decision to close the case also references provisions within Article 65 letter M of Law Number 20 Year 2025 and Article 34 of Law Number 1 Year 2023. “We are closing the case for the sake of legal interest. I repeat: closing the case for the sake of legal interest,” he emphatically declared, bringing a definitive end to the controversial case.
Summary
The Hogi Minaya case, where he was named a suspect after two muggers he pursued died in an accident, garnered significant national attention and public controversy. In response to the outcry, Sleman Police Chief Kombes Pol Edy Setyanto Erning Wibowo and the Sleman Traffic Head were temporarily suspended from their positions on January 30. This decision, confirmed by DIY Regional Police Chief Irjen Pol Anggoro Sukartono, aimed to facilitate an internal Propam investigation into allegations of weak supervision and lack of coordination during the case’s handling.
The internal investigation seeks to ensure objectivity and professionalism in law enforcement by examining potential disciplinary violations by officials involved. Concurrently, Mahfud MD highlighted that such administrative actions are part of Polri’s internal framework, stressing the importance of rectifying any errors in the legal process. Crucially, the Sleman District Prosecutor’s Office officially closed the criminal case against Hogi Minaya on January 30, citing “legal interest,” thereby concluding the controversial proceedings.