Heboh beredar isi putusan cerai diduga Ahmad Dhani-Maia, soal pernikahan siri dengan Mulan disorot

News Summary:

• A document, purportedly the divorce settlement between Ahmad Dhani and Maia Estianty, has gone viral on social media, immediately garnering public attention.
• The document’s content has sparked a stir, as it alludes to an alleged secret marriage linked to Mulan Jameela.
• However, the authenticity of the document remains unconfirmed and continues to fuel debate among netizens.

Teknowarta – A document circulating widely on social media, alleged to contain the details of the divorce settlement between prominent musicians Ahmad Dhani and Maia Estianty, has once again gone viral, igniting extensive public discussion. Shared across various platforms, the document swiftly captivated netizens due to its highly sensitive claims concerning the couple’s former household. One of the most intensely debated points within the document is the alleged mention of a secret marriage, purportedly linking Ahmad Dhani with Mulan Jameela.

Despite the fervor, no official confirmation regarding the authenticity of the circulating document has been issued by any of the involved parties. This resurfacing of an old issue has prompted the public to revisit and scrutinize the past marital journey of the celebrated musician couple.

Public reactions remain divided; a segment of netizens expresses skepticism, mindful of the abundance of unverified information often found circulating online. Conversely, a substantial number are actively dissecting and debating the contents of the document across digital platforms. Neither Ahmad Dhani, Maia Estianty, nor Mulan Jameela have offered recent statements concerning the renewed viral discussion, further intensifying speculation while the document’s veracity remains officially unconfirmed.

Previously, musician Ahmad Dhani publicly addressed the Supreme Court’s (MA) decision regarding his 2008 divorce from Maia Estianty. According to Dhani, the Supreme Court’s ruling explicitly disproved Maia’s allegations of his infidelity. He also claimed that Maia was not granted custody of their three children during the divorce proceedings, instead accusing Maia Estianty of having an affair with a television station owner as the true cause of their separation.

However, the alleged content of the recently surfaced divorce settlement, purportedly belonging to Ahmad Dhani and Maia, presents a contradictory narrative. An Instagram account, @rumpi_gosip, shared a snippet of what it claimed to be the 2008 divorce decree. This one-page document, notably, contained no statements suggesting Maia Estianty’s infidelity. Instead, the decree reportedly stated that Ahmad Dhani and Mulan Jameela had entered into a secret marriage, an event that allegedly occurred while Dhani was still legally married to Maia.

The document, presented as part of the court proceedings, includes a witness testimony. It states: “Considering that the fourth witness presented by the Plaintiff has, before the court under oath, stated the following matters: The witness knows the Plaintiff and Defendant as husband and wife. The witness knows the Plaintiff desires a divorce from the Defendant because the Defendant had a secret marriage with *, also known as Wulan Sari. The witness became aware of the Defendant’s secret marriage with * based on what * (Wulan Sari) recounted to the witness and other friends, including Melly Goeslaw, Vita (Wulan Sari’s manager), and Melly’s sibling. *, also known as Wulan Sari, shared this story around 2006 at Melly Goeslaw’s house. The witness was visiting Melly Goeslaw’s house when *, also known as Wulan Sari, called and asked the witness to wait for her. Upon her arrival, she invited them to speak in a special room, where she revealed that she had been secretly married in West Java. After sharing her story, *, also known as Wulan Sari, cried. As far as the witness knows, following this revelation, the Plaintiff and Defendant were still physically residing together. The story itself emerged on the initiative of *, also known as Wulan Sari. At that time, *’s manager, Vitta, became emotional. The Defendant then called Wulan Sari, asking her to return home. The witness also spoke to the Defendant by phone, inquiring about the marriage story, but the Defendant denied its existence. That night, *, also known as Wulan Sari, returned home by taxi. During the phone conversation, which was on speakerphone, the witness overheard the Defendant remark, ‘What kind of wife is still out late at night?’ After that conversation, Wulan later communicated via SMS that she had asked the Defendant for a divorce. The Defendant also once sent an SMS to Wulan, admitting that it was indeed pleasant to have two wives. The witness had previously informed the Plaintiff about these matters, though not as detailed as presented today. As a consequence of this confession, the relationship between the Plaintiff and Defendant became irrevocably disharmonious. As far as the witness knows, * (also known as Wulan Sari) never retracted her confession. It is true that the witness did not directly observe the marriage ceremony, but the witness believes her because Wulan Sari specifically requested a special room to share this information, indicating her seriousness. Furthermore, there was an extraordinary reaction, as the witness received threats from the Defendant.”

Beyond the marriage allegations, Kompas.com reported that in 2008, the custody of their three sons—Al, El, and Dul—was initially granted to Maia. Ahmad Dhani subsequently filed a judicial review (PK), which ultimately resulted in shared custody for both parents. However, despite this ruling, Al, El, and Dul reportedly resided with Ahmad Dhani. Maia even faced restrictions, as Ahmad Dhani allegedly prevented her from meeting their children. Consequently, Maia eventually stepped back, allowing Ahmad Dhani to take primary responsibility for their upbringing.

(TribunNewsmaker.com/TribunnewsBogor.com)